Raven Public Case Study
CASE 003 - Blind Replay
A full public-safe case study built from Raven internal/synthetic evidence and preserved engineering lessons.
Case structure
Problem
A replay is useful only if Package A is frozen before Package B and ground truth are opened.
Decision packet
The packet must record what Raven saw, what it inferred, and what remained unknown at the decision time.
Comparison
Outcome comparison must not feed back into the original recommendation.
Lesson learned
Blind replay tests decision quality without giving Raven the answer in advance.
Public-safe disclosure
This case study describes engineering evidence and decision boundaries. It does not disclose MTZ mechanics, private implementation rules or customer data.
Customer-specific savings, SLA impact and operational baseline require pilot validation.
Lessons learned
Before the test Raven assumed a bounded decision could be produced from visible evidence.
The data showed where confidence, consequence or replay freeze rules needed sharper separation.
The architecture response is preserved as a testable requirement rather than a marketing claim.